<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cake New York &#187; study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/tag/study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Interwebs Makes People Smarter</title>
		<link>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-interwebs-makes-people-smarter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-interwebs-makes-people-smarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bea Villamor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There have been theories in the past that the Internet has started to dumb people down &#8211; even The Atlantic&#8217;s Nicholas Carr wrote that the Internet &#8220;is chipping away [his] capacity for concentration and contemplation.&#8221; However, the latest Pew Research Center study, which I came across thanks to Mediabistro, begs to differ.</p>
<p>The Pew Internet and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been theories in the past that the Internet has started to dumb people down &#8211; even <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">The Atlantic&#8217;s</a> Nicholas Carr wrote that the Internet &#8220;is chipping away [his] capacity for concentration and contemplation.&#8221; However, the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Future-of-the-Internet-IV.aspx">latest Pew Research Center study</a>, which I came across thanks to <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/baynewser/our_digital_lives/survey_internet_will_make_us_smarter_by_2020_152639.asp">Mediabistro</a>, begs to differ.</p>
<p>The Pew Internet and American Life Project surveyed 895 &#8220;prominent scientists, business leaders, consultants, writers and technology developers.&#8221; Janna Anderson, the study&#8217;s co-author and Imagining the Internet Center Director, summed up the results:</p>
<p>* “3 out of 4 experts said our use of the Internet enhances and augments human intelligence&#8221;<br />
* &#8220;2/3 said use of the Internet has improved reading, writing and rendering of knowledge”</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not a stranger to lacking &#8220;concentration and contemplation&#8221; at times &#8211; as Nicholas Carr argues &#8211; I agree with the study that the Internet has certainly advanced people&#8217;s capacity.</p>
<p>Do you agree? Has the Internet enhanced you as a person? Leave a comment and share your thoughts here!</p>
 <img src="http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=554" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-interwebs-makes-people-smarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you a Conversationalist?</title>
		<link>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/01/20/are-you-a-conversationalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/01/20/are-you-a-conversationalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bea Villamor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["social media"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversationalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forrester research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social technographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new user label in the social media world: Conversationalists.</p>
<p>In 2007, Forrester developed profiles of social media users and visualized this in their &#8220;Social Technographics&#8221; infograph, which details each profile&#8217;s characteristics as well as its position in the social media hierarchy.
</p>
<p>But behaviors change, and Forrester is now adding a rung for Conversationalists: Facebook and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new user label in the social media world: Conversationalists.</p>
<p>In 2007, Forrester developed profiles of social media users and visualized this in their &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/.a/6a00d8341c50bf53ef0120a7d7a3be970b-pi">Social Technographics</a>&#8221; infograph, which details each profile&#8217;s characteristics as well as its position in the social media hierarchy.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/.a/6a00d8341c50bf53ef0120a7d7a3be970b-pi"><img class="alignleft" src="http://blogs.forrester.com/.a/6a00d8341c50bf53ef0120a7d7a3be970b-pi" alt="" width="376" height="417" /></a></p>
<p>But behaviors change, and Forrester is now adding a rung for <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/groundswell/2010/01/conversationalists-get-onto-the-ladder.html">Conversationalists</a>: Facebook and Twitter users &#8220;who update [their] social network status&#8221; on a weekly basis.</p>
<p>Conversationalists are ranked second only to Creators, individuals who create their own content and share it online.</p>
<p>Interestingly, 56% of Conversationalists are female and 70% are 30 years old or older. <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=120910&amp;nid=110168">MediaPost</a> has some detailed age breakdowns as well.</p>
<p>So, what does this mean for social media marketers?</p>
<p>The emergence of the Conversationalist profile reinforces that numbers do not determine one&#8217;s social media currency &#8211; a high number of Facebook friends and Twitter followers are only significant when the user regularly communicates with their friends and followers. There is greater value in an individual&#8217;s level of engagement, which determines their clout online.</p>
<p>So are you a Conversationalist? I know I am, so share your thoughts by posting a comment below or by pinging me on <a href="http://twitter.com/beatrizv520">Twitter</a>.</p>
 <img src="http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=322" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cakegroupnyc.com/blog/2010/01/20/are-you-a-conversationalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
